Freight Railroads Seek to Allow Risk Sharing as Condition for Transport

WASHINGTON — Calling the safety of the American public of paramount importance, the nation’s freight railroads today urged the country’s shippers of highly hazardous materials or toxic inhalation hazards (TIH) to become full partners with the railroads in safely transporting those dangerous commodities.

“Nothing is more important than the safety of our employees and the communities through which we operate,” said Edward R. Hamberger, president and CEO of the Association of American Railroads (AAR) during a hearing at the Surface Transportation Board (STB) on the railroad industry’s common carrier obligation as it relates to hazardous materials. “It’s only reasonable that those who make extremely hazardous materials demonstrate that they also have the same public safety commitment.”

The railroad industry, Hamberger emphasized, is not seeking to eliminate its common carrier obligation with respect to TIH at this time. “Rail is the safest and most secure mode of transporting TIH, many of which play an important role in the national economy. However, if there is a public interest need for the railroads to be compelled to carry TIH materials, there is a corresponding public interest imperative for the industry to do what is necessary to best ensure the public’s safety.”

Hamberger said freight railroads are doing their part to ensure that highly hazardous chemicals are delivered safely, but asked the STB to recognize that given the unique risks involved in transporting these dangerous chemicals, that shippers share those risks with the railroads and share the effort to find ways to eliminate those risks entirely.

AAR testified before the STB that freight railroads remain willing to assume the risks that are normally associated with railroad transport of any commodity. For the Class I railroads, the AAR suggested that amount would be at least $500 million. However, AAR said the STB should find it reasonable for shippers of highly toxic materials to share the risk, and indemnify the railroads beyond that level, due to the unique risks associated with those commodities.

“Railroads spend billions of dollars every year to ensure the safety of our rail network,” Hamberger noted, including what is necessary for the transport of TIH materials, which account for 100,000 carloads out of 32 million, or just three-tenths of one percent of total rail volume. “We train thousands of local emergency responders and have implemented special operating procedures on trains carrying TIH. It’s only right that those who make and ship these dangerous chemicals both share in the risks we face to transport their hazardous materials and have the same incentive to eliminate those risks.”

Hamberger pointed out that the only way to completely eliminate the risks inherent in moving highly toxic chemicals by rail is to replace those hazardous materials with safer chemicals and technologies. He urged shippers to devote more resources toward developing safer substitutes to replace TIH materials.

The AAR’s suggestion was supported by Paul Orum, who authored Toxic Trains and the Terrorist Threat for the Center for American Progress. “Requiring those who manufacture and ship TIH materials by rail to cover liability insurance commensurate with the hazard would add an important incentive to use and develop feasible alternatives,” Orum said. “The safest way to make safer communities is to get unnecessary toxic cargoes off the rail tracks.”

Orum also noted that in 2007 only 24 drinking water and 13 wastewater facilities in the U.S. still receive chlorine by rail, and since 2001, at least six drinking water and 19 wastewater facilities in the U.S. have switched to using a less hazardous disinfectant, thus eliminating the need to receive chlorine gas by rail.

Railfanning Review Podcast

Before you copy and paste this information to your website, please keep in mind this research took a lot of effort. Appreciate it. Learn from it. But do not plagiarize it. Yes, if you think we might be talking to you, we are.